In a hypothetical scenario, a researcher claims that a specific vaccine causes a rare neurological disorder. If this claim is based on a study with significant methodological flaws, what is the most appropriate response from the scientific community?

A. Accept the claim as valid until proven otherwise.

B. Conduct further research to verify the claim's validity.

C. Immediately withdraw the vaccine from public use.

D. Publicly discredit the researcher without further investigation.

答案解析

This question evaluates the understanding of scientific inquiry and the process of validating research claims. The correct response is B, as the scientific community should investigate the claim through further research to determine its validity. Option A is incorrect because claims must be substantiated by rigorous evidence. Option C is an overreaction without sufficient evidence. Option D is unethical and undermines the principles of scientific discourse. Thus, the answer is B.

正确答案：B

In a hypothetical scenario, a researcher claims that a specific vaccine causes a rare neurological disorder. If this claim is based on a study with significant methodological flaws, what is the most appropriate response from the scientific community?

答案解析

随机推荐