This question focuses on the interpretation of language that suggests a hidden issue. It tests your ability to understand that an initial positive impression can be overturned by closer inspection. **Core Concept:** This question assesses the comprehension of the phrase 'upon closer examination' and how it introduces a contrast to the initial perception, highlighting the difference between surface appearance and a deeper analysis. The emphasis is on the subtlety of the inconsistencies and not an outright falsehood. **Solution:** * **Option A:** This option is too extreme. The statement mentions inconsistencies, not that the testimony was entirely fabricated. * **Option B:** This is the correct interpretation. The phrase 'seemingly consistent' suggests an initial appearance of coherence, while 'upon closer examination revealed inconsistencies' indicates hidden discrepancies were present but not obvious initially. * **Option C:** This option contradicts the phrase 'seemingly consistent', which suggests an initial impression of coherence. * **Option D:** This option contradicts the entire premise of the sentence, which specifically states inconsistencies. **Correct Answer:** B **Easy-mistake reminder:** It's easy to be misled by 'seemingly consistent', and overlook the importance of the phrase 'upon closer examination'. The key here is to understand that the initial perception was surface-level and not entirely accurate, which the word 'revealed' is a vital clue.